Skip to content

Who is Turo’s Competitors?

The rise of sharing economy companies has created an entirely new sector of businesses that offer unique services that enable people to share and rent their assets. One such company is Turo, which is an online car-sharing marketplace that connects car owners with people who want to rent vehicles. Since its inception, Turo has been one of the leading car-sharing companies, but it has competitors. This blog post will explore who Turo’s competitors are and compare their features and pricing.

Zipcar

Zipcar is a car-sharing company in several cities across the US, Canada, and Europe. Unlike Turo, Zipcar owns the cars that it rents out, and users can reserve a car for as little as an hour or as long as several days. Zipcar operates on a membership-based model, and users can choose from several plans depending on their needs.

Regarding pricing, Zipcar’s rates vary based on the location and the type of car being rented. For example, renting a small car for an hour in New York City could cost around $14, while renting an SUV for the same duration in San Francisco could cost about $18. Zipcar’s pricing is generally more expensive than Turo, but it does offer a more convenient rental experience, as users can pick up and drop off cars at designated Zipcar locations without having to coordinate with the owner of the vehicle.

Getaround

Getaround is a peer-to-peer car-sharing platform operating in several US cities, including San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Chicago. Like Turo, Getaround allows car owners to rent out their vehicles to people who need them, but there are some key differences between the two platforms.

One of the biggest differences between Getaround and Turo is that Getaround offers a more flexible rental experience. Users can rent cars by the hour, day, or week, and no membership fees or deposits are required to use the platform. Regarding pricing, Getaround’s rates vary based on the location and the type of car being rented. Renting a small car for an hour in San Francisco could cost around $8, while renting an SUV for the same duration could cost about $20.

Getaround’s pricing is generally more affordable than Turo’s but has some drawbacks. Because Getaround operates on a peer-to-peer model, the quality of the rental experience can vary depending on the vehicle owner. Additionally, Getaround has faced criticism for its insurance policies, which have been described as confusing and potentially inadequate.

Maven

Maven is a car-sharing platform that General Motors own. The platform operates in several cities across the US, and users can rent vehicles for as little as an hour or as long as several days. Unlike Turo, Maven owns the cars it rents out, and users can pick up and drop off cars at designated Maven locations.

Regarding pricing, Maven’s rates vary based on the location and the type of car being rented. Renting a small car for an hour in San Francisco could cost around $8, while renting an SUV for the same duration could cost about $20. Maven’s pricing is generally similar to Getaround’s, but it does offer a more consistent rental experience, as all of the vehicles on the platform are owned and maintained by Maven.

Car2Go

Car2Go is a car-sharing platform in several US, Canada, and Europe cities. The platform allows users to rent vehicles for as little as an hour or as long as several days, and users can pick up and drop off cars at designated Car2Go locations. Unlike Turo, Car2Go owns cars that it rents out, and users do not need to coordinate with the vehicle owner.

Regarding pricing, Car2Go’s rates vary based on the location and the type of car being rented. Renting a small car for an hour in New York City could cost around $0.41 per minute, while renting an SUV for the same duration in Vancouver could cost around $0.47 per minute. Car2Go’s pricing is generally more expensive than Turo’s. Still, it does offer a more convenient rental experience, as users can pick up and drop off cars at designated Car2Go locations without having to coordinate with the owner of the vehicle.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Turo has several competitors in the car-sharing space, each offering a unique rental experience and pricing structure. Zipcar offers a convenient rental experience, but its pricing is generally more expensive than Turo’s. Getaround offers a more flexible rental experience than Turo, but the quality of the rental experience can vary depending on the owner of the vehicle.

Maven offers a more consistent rental experience than Turo, but its fleet of cars is limited to the ones that it owns. Car2Go offers a convenient rental experience, but its pricing is generally more expensive than Turo’s. Ultimately, the best car-sharing platform for you will depend on your individual needs and preferences.